• infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    13
    ·
    13 hours ago

    And after 26+ years of friendship, my buddy chose this month to be the month where he finally hunkered down and built his first PC. Of all the times to build a budget parts list for a friend…

    • eldebryn@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      18
      ·
      13 hours ago

      This isn’t typical price gouging. It’s an industry moving away from consumers because our buying power is nothing compared to large corporations running on AI circlejerk VCs.

      • Typhoon@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        8 hours ago

        It’s also desirable for them because it decreases people building their own computers and pushing more people to buying premade ones they sell.

        • 9488fcea02a9@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          53 minutes ago

          No, the endgame is for all the compute power to be in the cloud, and you rent time on their servers.

          Everyone will just be running thin clients at home, with subscriptions if they need to do anything more than send an email

      • monotremata@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        13 hours ago

        I mean, it is also that OpenAI cornered the RAM market, which is a typical price gouging scenario; it’s just weird that OpenAI wasn’t trying to make money directly through the maneuver. It does seem like they wanted prices to rise, though, to increase the barrier to competition.

        • eldebryn@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          4
          ·
          10 hours ago

          It’s almost like unregulated capitalism is a certain highway to oligarchy and authoritarianism.

  • dantheclamman@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    38
    arrow-down
    3
    ·
    23 hours ago

    Our economy increasingly is consumed to serve the rich. They are eating the world. Grocery stores increasingly cater to the wealthy. So do the automakers. Billionaires are buying up whole city blocks for themselves. And now we won’t be able to buy electronics because they’ve taken the resources for their speculative investments, and if they crash the economy our tax dollars will be appropriated to bail them out. It’s almost like we’re barreling towards a violent confrontation between the classes…

    • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      18 hours ago

      I for one am in favor of throwing the rich into wood chippers.

      The rich and their bought and paid for politicians.

      Feet first.

  • rumba@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    14
    ·
    20 hours ago

    memory is way up

    GPU’s will need memory, production cuts

    followed by production cuts for cpu’s monitors and powersupplies

    welcome to the $10k mid range gaming PC in 2027

      • infinitesunrise@slrpnk.net
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        10
        ·
        13 hours ago

        And my monthly power bill has tripled to subsidize them. I’m paying for several new PCs for someone whether I like it or not.

    • kadu@scribe.disroot.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      7
      ·
      19 hours ago

      I wonder if developers will finally start taking middle end GPUs and the existing handhelds seriously.

      There are “Deck optimized” games that run horrendously. But what if people can’t afford new hardware for the next four years? It’s either fix the performance or lose sales. The Switch 2 is likely going to become the most common performance target, and having only 12GBs of shared memory, it actually helps PCs in this situation.

      • FalschgeldFurkan@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        19 hours ago

        I wonder if developers will finally start taking middle end GPUs and the existing handhelds seriously

        They’ll have to, soon enough, if they wanna continue selling games

      • rumba@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        19 hours ago

        run horrendously. But what if people can’t afford new hardware for the next four years? It’s either fix the performance or lose sales. The Switch 2 is likely going to become the most common performance target, and having only 12GBs of shared memory, it actually helps PCs in this situation.

        One could hope, but the cost will carry through to consoles as well :(

  • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    8
    ·
    18 hours ago

    i really wish I could have eeked out one more GPU upgrade before the shit hit the fan…but GPUs are at the point now where you gotta upgrade the PSU to upgrade the GPU since power draw demands are getting absolutely donk.

    • ApatheticCactus@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      12 hours ago

      Weird aside, but I have a 14900k which just eats power. About 400ish watts draw during CPU benchmarks for total ststem draw. I had a 1000w psu and finally got a 5090. Now a 400w cpu + 600w gpu should not work- but it did. I did stress test both at the same time and hit 1100w, but it lived. Thing is, most games do not stress borh CPU and GPU at max at the same time, so real world usage I was always under.

      Still, I want headroom, so I got a deal on a 1500w psu. New PSU is more efficient, and running the same simultaneous cpu/gpu benchmark I hit about 960w, so the efficiency bump kept me under my old psu limit. It did lead me to get a new PSU, but technically it would have been mostly okay.

    • monotremata@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      12 hours ago

      GPUs at least are actually not that expensive right now. Aside from the 5090, they’re mostly close to MSRP, which is a pretty novel situation. I was waiting to upgrade my whole system for that, though, because my CPU would be a bottleneck at this point, and that’s not really an option now because of the crazy RAM prices. The past few years have been super frustrating for PC builders.

      • A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        edit-2
        12 hours ago

        for now

        by the time i can afford it, and a new PSU, the ram issue will probably see GPUs skyrocket as well. Especially with companies cutting consumer production for AI production.

        • monotremata@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          3 hours ago

          Yeah. At least I managed to pick up a used 3070 a couple years ago. I’ll just jolly along my old i7-7700k system for a few more years…

  • VirtuePacket@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    62
    ·
    2 days ago

    It’s such a shame to see high-performance computing and gaming more broadly become largely unaffordable. Hell, prior to the DRAM shortage, the current-generation game consoles were already MORE EXPENSIVE than they were at launch. And it’s just going to get worse.

  • oh_@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    85
    ·
    2 days ago

    On the plus side, indie games that don’t require a rocket ship for a PC have never been better. So, can still play some good stuff on my old clunker. Thanks to Steam/Proton, they run even better on my old computer.

    • DefederateLemmyMl@feddit.nl
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      49
      ·
      2 days ago

      Would be nice to see the gaming industry pivot back to making innovative games within the constraints of hardware, instead of just expecting customers to throw ever more powerful (and power consuming) hardware at it.

      • MIDItheKID@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        18
        ·
        2 days ago

        As much (well deserved) hate that Nintendo gets, they are fantastic at this. They seem to be able to make games look good on low powered systems with stylistic decisions and smart optimization/coding. They learned some pretty important things in the NES/SNES era about using tricks to squeeze performance out of the few KB/MB they had to work with.

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        14
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        DLSS has made devs lazy. Why bother optimizing when you can have some whiz bang AI algorithm turn a low res input into a greasy looking high res output.

  • Bakkoda@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    41
    ·
    2 days ago

    Or gpu prices or hdd/ssd prices that never recovered from the tsunami. Consumers just keep getting fucked.

    • rumba@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      19 hours ago

      Prices don’t generally recover; any reason for a price rise is a reason to make it the new norm.

      Used to be, competition would spring up and keep them in check, but now that the entire market is 6 companies in a trench coat, any new competitor would just be acquired or forced out of business with legal demands or supplier tampering.

  • kieron115@startrek.website
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    edit-2
    1 day ago

    I’m sure it doesn’t help that motherboard manufacturers have increasingly been targeting “whale” consumers over the last 10-15 years. I remember when a top of the line motherboard would cost you $300; and an average board was around $100-150.

    • GenosseFlosse@feddit.org
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 day ago

      Have not built a PC since Windows7, what is the difference between a 150 and a top of the line motherboard?

      • kieron115@startrek.website
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        1 day ago

        I’m talking more like the Windows ME/XP days to be honest. But too many to count. It’s more that actually useful features that used to be fairly standard (like 7-segment status displays and speakers) are effectively being gated behind $500+ motherboards to make them more attractive. A board that would have come with alphanumeric status codes now is lucky to ship with a couple LEDs that just indicate where a problem is at, not what the specific problem is.

  • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    31
    ·
    2 days ago

    I’m on ryzen 9 5900x, rtx 3080, 32 GB DDR4, with mobo and psu that’s ~€850 today and it will play most modern games on high settings 1080p at +100 fps. Computer hardware these days is a lot more like car hardware than it used to be. Generational improvements aren’t as big and the price for a used 5 year old unit is a ⅓ of a new one. Unless you absolutely need the latest and greatest go with a used last gen.

    • hoppolito@mander.xyz
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      19 hours ago

      https://pcpartpicker.com/list/XpFtXR

      That setup would currently run for around $1730? Without investing into a monitor, or any peripherals like keyboard, mouse, etc and picking a relatively cheap psu/case/cooler combo.

      Maybe I misunderstood but seems a far cry from €850.

      • qwerty@discuss.tchncs.de
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        2
        ·
        17 hours ago

        Your prices are msrp for unused components.

        On my local equivalent of ebay/amazon I can get a used 3080 10 GB for $390, ryzen 9 5900x $265, 32 GB DDR4 3200 mHz $170, new b550 mobo $80, 750w psu 80+ gold $70. $975 total. I didn’t count anything else coz a lot of people already have those things from their old PCs and they’re super cheep. For a full ~$1000 build add a $60 512 GB sata ssd. Cooler will set you back $15, same as a 1080p screen, case and m+k combo and a lot of the time you can get those things for free and they will last you a lifetime.

        This is my first ever keyboard that I got for free from an office that was closing down and I use it to this day. Eventually I had to buy a PS/2 to USB dongle but that’s like $5. I have a 2nd spare one in case the 1st one breaks. I plan on using it till I die.

        • hoppolito@mander.xyz
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          8 hours ago

          I see the misunderstanding, didn’t consciously see the ‘used’ hardware in your post above. That makes a lot more sense!

      • TangledHyphae@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        21 hours ago

        Same here, except 64GB of RAM, I can’t even remember how much that cost 4 years ago but I’m afraid to check the receipt at this point.

      • zebidiah@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        1 day ago

        I mean… We will learn to make our rigs last, do more with less, and carry on optimizing Linux builds. Anything you can run today, you’ll be able to run tomorrow. And there is enough backlog to keep us all busy until at least 2028… Be honest with yourself lol

        • vacuumflower@lemmy.sdf.org
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          ·
          1 day ago

          I mean, a PC from year 1999 is in the realm of possible for plenty of more localized production chains than needed to have that monster with Ryzen in the name.

          And it’s not unreasonable to expect such a scattering of production. It happened with plenty of technologies. Also it’s not unreasonable to expect a return from more sophisticated and powerful material culture to one less so at both, but more accessible.

          That’s what happened with automobiles a few times in history, that’s what happened with construction technologies and money many times in history, with food, with warfare.

          That semiconductors are something challenging in complexity to produce - that actually makes such scattering more probable.

          It’s not much different from chinaware or late medieval metallurgy needed for firearms. Strategic technologies are hard to achieve and it’s simpler to purchase their output, but eventually everyone realizes they need their own.

          So I really hope that instead of the same not really diverse ecosystem of Intel, AMD and ARM powerful hardware we’ll have a thousand different local manufacturers of partially compatible hardware far weaker, like Amiga 1200, but more interesting.

          Perhaps this will also be similar to the transition from late Rome to early Middle Ages.

          It just makes sense historically. More distributed production environment can support smaller efficiency, - can’t make and sell on the same scale, - but there will be constant pressure to have it.

          Of course, in reality this is all alarmism for no reason. There will be a bubble burst, suppose, - well, then there’ll be plenty of cheap hardware thrown out. The RAM manufacturers will have hard times, but it’ll balance out eventually. Just how it did after the dotcom bubble, not in the best way, perhaps with only a few manufacturers remaining, but it will. Or if there will be no bubble burst, suppose all that computing power founds an application with non-speculative value, - well, there’s still long way to go before your typical PC usage starts requiring really expensive amounts of RAM. If we drop the Web, even with modern Linux or FreeBSD one could survive on 2GB RAM and Intel C2D in year 2019. Then on 4GB, almost comfortable, even playing some games.

          One good thing I’m seeing - those RAM prices can eventually kill the Web. It’s the most RAM-hungry part of our needs for no good reason. Perhaps Gemini is not what can replace it, it’s too basic, but I can see it becoming in corporate interest to support a leaner non-compatible replacement for the same niche. And corporate interest kills.

          Or perhaps they’ll like some sort of semantic web gone wrong way - with some kind of “web” intended for AI agents, not humans, with humans having a chat prompt.

    • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      2 days ago

      Here’s to hoping that it increases pressure to break the cartels and start getting the ball rolling on more independent foundries.

      • JoeBigelow@lemmy.ca
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        2 days ago

        Problem I see with new foundries is that the profit is still going to be selling to data centers. It would take a philanthrope like Marc Cuban selling meds at cost, selling at a loss to enthusiasts.

        Calling Marc Cuban a philanthrope feels icky, but he is doing a thing that I think is genuine.

        • TheObviousSolution@lemmy.ca
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          3
          ·
          1 day ago

          It doesn’t matter as long a the supply continues to grow. It also helps make the rest of the world less dependent on a US hegemony that’s now going sour. When investment firms are buying up so much inventory for data centers that aren’t even operational, a big part of that exists as an excuse for market manipulation by the really big hitters that have their presence in those cartels anyway. Once they start feeding their own demise and market competition, they will back off pretty quickly and will likely saturate the market from the surplus inventory they are clearly hoarding under bullshit excuses to try to eliminate and buy up the nascent competition.

    • GamingChairModel@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      10
      ·
      2 days ago

      Do MSI and ASUS have enough corporate/enterprise sales to offset the loss of consumer demand? With the RAM companies the consumer crunch is caused by AI companies bidding up the price of raw memory silicon well beyond what makes financial sense to package and solder onto DIMMs (or even directly solder the packages onto boards for ultra thin laptops).

      • Nollij@sopuli.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        2 days ago

        Asus is a significant ODM, supplying boards for brands like HP. I’m not sure what lines/models they make today, but they are a lot bigger than just their consumer lines.

  • underisk@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    357
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    2 days ago

    what if we cannibalize our long-term viability for a short-term gain says every dipshit in charge of tech hardware manufacturing.

    • ferrule@sh.itjust.works
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      189
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      2 days ago

      you know when the bubble pops and they no longer have AI companies buying RAM they will switch back to consumers and keep the high prices.

      • underisk@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        135
        ·
        2 days ago

        if they’re still around when the financial shell game they’re playing finally comes to a stop. who am i kidding the government will bail them out.

          • underisk@lemmy.ml
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            24
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            edit-2
            2 days ago

            if the US government were actually funded by taxes, then everything the government does would be with “my money”

            • Rinox@feddit.it
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              ·
              23 hours ago

              Even if the government is funded by money printed by the central bank, it would still be funded with “your money”. Every dollar printed dilutes your money by that same amount, ie it’s like a much more subtle tax that doesn’t follow any of the principles of proportionality, everyone pays the same (except those with little to no liquidity and everything invested, so it’s really a tax on the poor through inflation)

            • Nalivai@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              28
              ·
              2 days ago

              Well, if you’re a citizen, the country is yours, and the government is there to manage it, but some assholes in power managed to convince people that it’s the other way around

          • mesa@piefed.social
            cake
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            9
            ·
            2 days ago

            That only works if we (the collective we) have more money. If a rich person has more $$ than a small country that means the effect we have is equivalent.

            That’s why micron is doing what its doing. We are no longer the customer. They voted for us.

      • ☂️-@lemmy.ml
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        1 day ago

        ha. they are renting the datacenters back to us.

        its gonna be forced cloud computing for us and total control for them.

      • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        Keeping prices above what people are willing to buy for, while the majority of their business goes bust, is not a recipe to stay in business.

        • ferrule@sh.itjust.works
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          14 hours ago

          But consumers are stupid. when they start selling ram again at a high price we should all boycot buying computers. instead a lot of people will just accept the new price. we saw it after the pandemic, people just accepting prices instead of holding fast and forcing prices down.

          • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            1
            ·
            edit-2
            5 hours ago

            You’re saying this as a comment on an article about how drastically sales have already dropped due to the price increases… people are already doing that.

      • Scratch@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        6
        ·
        2 days ago

        Of course, not all the companies survive and now there’s decreased competition, so we can shove prices up a little bit further

    • 4am@lemmy.zip
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      46
      ·
      2 days ago

      Every business is doing this for everything. To different degrees but they are all chasing their “get our fortune now and get the fuck out because the sky is falling” mentality. Have been since Trump 1.0 and now it’s accelerating rapidly.

      • SportsRulesOpinions@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        17
        ·
        2 days ago

        You have to remember that “get that bag” is practically inherit to business. We spend a lot of time and effort making it illegal to fuck people over and do bad business stuff, but kinda-sorta since Regan the businesses have slowly been winning that battle.

    • kboos1@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      26
      ·
      2 days ago

      That’s every company, most upper management don’t stay in one position for more than 2 years. So the system is setup for short term gains because investors aren’t interested in long term investments and the blowback is the next guys problem. Who then is looking for the next big win to cover up the last guy issues without fixing anything. Then they bring in someone to clean up the mess and the cycle starts again.

      Plus most consumers have short memories or don’t have an alternative so their stuck. There are small groups holding on but for 75% of the world’s population right now it’s Android or iOS, AMD or Intel, AMD or NVIDIA, Samsung or WD or Seagate or SanDisk, Att or Verizon, Apple or Microsoft, and so on.

      • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        2 days ago

        That’s every company

        Not every company, just most. Privately owned corporations aren’t legally obligated to kill long-term viability for short-term gaing like publicly traded companies are.

        Many owners of privately owned corps are that dumb, but not all of them

        • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          2
          arrow-down
          1
          ·
          1 day ago

          aren’t legally obligated to kill long-term viability for short-term gaing like publicly traded companies are.

          Public companies are not obligated to do this. This is caused by the stock options that CEOs/other upper management gets. They want to maximize their gains on their could of years they serve before jumping ship to the next company.

          • mnemonicmonkeys@sh.itjust.works
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            3
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            1 day ago

            False. There’s a thing called fiduciary duty where companies are obligated to make profitable decisions for their shareholders. If they don’t prioritize short term gains they’re opened up to lawsuits from investors

            • Bronzebeard@lemmy.zip
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              1
              arrow-down
              2
              ·
              edit-2
              19 hours ago

              Fiduciary duty does not require they tank long term profitability for short term gains. That’s an idiotic belief you have.

    • BrianTheeBiscuiteer@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 days ago

      Also your reputation. I had a Crucial SSD and was days from getting an identical one as a backup but then they said they were stopping consumer RAM sales so they’re now on my blacklist.

      • TheGrandNagus@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        12
        ·
        edit-2
        2 days ago

        Question is, though, who now isn’t on your blacklist?

        Samsung and SK Hynix never sold to consumers directly, yet seem to be avoiding flak. Micron is now joining them in that.

        Who do you get that isn’t that three? Almost all RAM on the market is Samsung, SK Hynix, or Micron.

        On top of that, Samsung and SK Hynix were the ones that signed the OpenAI deal (OpenAI bought 40% of the world’s DRAM supply and kicked off panic buying), so tbh Micron is the least responsible for the current DRAM market issues.

    • douglasg14b@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      2 days ago

      It’s a play to make at home compute unachievable, forcing people to pay for subscription cloud services and cloud compute in walled gardens.

      • ✺roguetrick✺@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        1
        ·
        1 day ago

        I don’t agree. The prices will rise across the board no matter where you site the memory or if it’s in a gaming computer or otherwise. Renting will always be more expensive than owning because competitors must recoup the capital cost of buying and make margin at the same time.