The lone woman on Tennessee’s death row was still alive after she was administered two lethal injections, her lawyer said in a motion seeking to halt her execution Wednesday night, a stunning development after the Supreme Court had stepped in to allow the state to put her to death.

At 8:26 p.m. local time, witnesses said “executioners had injected both syringes of lethal injection chemicals” and Christa Pike was “still alive and snoring,” her lawyers said in a federal court filing.

They said Pike “has not lost consciousness and still has a heartbeat” and that curtains to the death chamber “have gone down twice.”

  • DarkFuture@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    2 hours ago

    I mean is it really more humane than a guillotine or are we just doing lethal injections to make those witnessing it feel more comfortable?

    As long as it’s built properly a guillotine is pretty effective the first go around.

    • iamthetot@piefed.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      2 hours ago

      It’s absolutely for the sake of the audience, and I don’t know anyone that reasonably argues otherwise.

  • UltraGiGaGigantic@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    A lethal dose of opiates.

    I feel like if a execution doesn’t work, the person should be free to go. They already went through the execution and served their sentance.

    Then the government would actually give a shit.

    • Tenthrow@lemmy.worldM
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      I don’t know about “Free to go” but definitely not, “let’s keep executing them until it sticks.”

  • stickyprimer@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    20
    ·
    3 hours ago

    I’ve been hearing for years that it’s very hard for the government to find qualified doctors who will work with them on this technology or help administer it, and that makes it extremely hard to carry out reliably. This is far from an isolated incident.

    • CedricWhaley@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      9
      ·
      3 hours ago

      It’s also pretty hard to source the chemicals because some of the manufacturers won’t sell when they find out what it’s being used for.

      • jacksilver@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        54 minutes ago

        Kinda makes you wonder about the whole concept when no one wants to be involved.

        I wonder if it was like jury duty and anyone could be randomly selected to be the executioner if support for the death penalty would change.

        Edit: By wonder, I mean it somewhat flippantly. Like “maybe this ain’t such a grand idea if no one wants to be anywhere near it”

  • dogslayeggs@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    9
    ·
    5 hours ago

    This feels like a “ball don’t lie” situation.

    Or, since the religious conservatives who love life also really like killing people, this is like God ordering a stay of execution.

  • JustPlainDave@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    33
    ·
    8 hours ago

    You’d think there’d be a sort of double-jeopardy thing in relation to lethal injections.

    Something like the old Western movie trope of how you can’t be hanged twice.

    • casualvagrancy@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      57 minutes ago

      “We’re going to murder you to show that murder is wrong. You can’t just go killing people to get revenge because you came up with some elaborate ritual to justify it!” Always seemed like a weird take.

      Also, we murder murderers but we don’t rape rapists. We don’t rape rapists because we have to be clear that rape is always wrong, no matter what. But we’re ok sending the message that murder is ok when we do it, just not when you do it.

    • mobyduck648@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      37
      ·
      9 hours ago

      The whole notion of lethal injections is the product of a sick and cowardly mentality in my view.

      I oppose the death penalty in general, but at least the gallows or the firing squad have the decency not to lie about what they are: the state violently ending someone’s life in cold blood. The lethal injection is a perverse inversion of medicine, it exists solely to protect the moral blushes of the pieces of crap who carry it out. Only a profoundly immoral political culture could invent something so blatantly perverted in my view. I particularly loathe the concept for this reason:

      If executions are gruesome enough the people who order them haven’t the stomach to pull the lever on the gallows, the correct response is to abolish the death penalty; not to sanitise it behind a ghastly pseudo-medical ritual which exists solely to allow those people to sleep at night. It is a coward’s way to have the death penalty without being considered cruel and despotic, but it is in reality among the most cruel and despotic forms of execution. If executions are to take place at all (and I think they should not) they should be very public, very swift, and very traditional so people are forced to see what the death penalty actually is.