“Jill Stein is a useful idiot for Russia. After parroting Kremlin talking points and being propped up by bad actors in 2016 she’s at it again,” DNC spokesman Matt Corridoni said in a statement to The Bulwark. “Jill Stein won’t become president, but her spoiler candidacy—that both the GOP and Putin have previously shown interest in—can help decide who wins. A vote for Stein is a vote for Trump.”

  • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    88
    arrow-down
    12
    ·
    edit-2
    1 hour ago

    i’m glad the “you’re pro-genocide if you vote anything but 3rd party” morons finally shut the fuck up around here

    edit: LOL

    have you had ANYONE turn around and say " you know what, you’re right!" on lemmy? or ANYWHERE?

    gtfo russian cumfarts

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        1 hour ago

        tweedledee and tweedledipshit right here in this thread fighting the stupid fight

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      41
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      2 hours ago

      Probably doesn’t help that Stein refuses to call Putin a war criminal.

      https://www.newsweek.com/jill-stein-vladimir-putin-war-criminal-1954965

      "Hasan later asked Stein why she had labeled Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu a war criminal, but not Putin.

      “Well, as John F. Kennedy said, we must not negotiate out of fear and we must not fear to negotiate,” she replied. “So, if you want to be an effective world leader, you don’t start by name-calling and hurling epithets.”

      “So, how will President Stein negotiate with Israel then if you’ve called Netanyahu a war criminal?” Hasan asked in response.

      “Well, because he very clearly is a war criminal,” Stein said, prompting Hasan to ask: “So Putin clearly isn’t a war criminal?”

      “Well, we don’t have a decision—put it this way—by the International Criminal Court,” Stein said.

      The ICC has issued an arrest warrant for Putin, alleging that he is responsible for war crimes. No such warrant has been issued for Netanyahu, whose war on Gaza has killed more than 40,000 Palestinians. However, the chief prosecutor of the ICC has applied for an arrest warrant for the Israeli prime minister.

      “There’s an arrest warrant for Putin and there isn’t an arrest warrant for Netanyahu, so why is Putin not a war criminal, but Netanyahu is?” Hasan asked.

      “Yeah. Well, let me say this. We are sponsoring that war. We are sponsoring Netanyahu,” Stein responded. “He is our dog in this fight. That is why we have a responsibility to pull him back.”"

      • neatchee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        9
        arrow-down
        3
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Fwiw after that whole thing made news she released a press statement that did call him a war criminal

        • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
          link
          fedilink
          arrow-up
          21
          arrow-down
          4
          ·
          2 hours ago

          “Hey, Vladimir? I need to actually call you a war criminal now, yeah, I almost got found out. Thanks! I knew you’d understand!”

      • blazera@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        13
        ·
        2 hours ago

        You forgot this part from the beginning

        "Mehdi Hasan: Vladimir Putin is a war criminal?

        Jill Stein: Yes, we did condemn —"

        She called him a war criminal several times in the interview

            • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              16
              arrow-down
              1
              ·
              2 hours ago

              “Yes we did condemn…” is not the same as “Yes, Putin is a war criminal.”

              The passive accusations run all through it.

              “So, what we said about Putin was that his invasion of Ukraine is criminal. It’s a criminal and murderous war,”

              “Well, by implication, by implication,” Stein said.

              “In so many words, yes he is,” Stein said. “If you want to pull him back, if you are a world leader, you don’t begin your conversation by calling someone a war criminal.”

        • grue@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          9
          ·
          edit-2
          49 minutes ago

          LOL, that just proves his point. I read the transcript, and Stein had every opportunity to clearly and definitively repudiate Putin. Not only did she refuse to do so, she continues to refuse, dishonestly misrepresents being called out on her bad faith as a “misunderstanding,” and doubles down with bullshit "both sides"ism.

          In fact, that press release has sealed the deal on convincing me that she’s a deeply unserious piece of shit and a Russian asset.

          So congratulations troll farm vatniks, you’ve played yourselves.

    • empireOfLove2@lemmy.dbzer0.com
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      38
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      3 hours ago

      Ahahaha oh no the “office workers” are still all over here, their content usually just gets downvoted into being permanently hidden and they’ve stopped picking fights outside of their own posts.

      • neatchee@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        arrow-up
        23
        arrow-down
        2
        ·
        2 hours ago

        Don’t forget there was also a bunch of government-backed troll farms shut down recently

    • sub_ubi@lemmy.ml
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      8
      ·
      edit-2
      45 minutes ago

      How does it feel when you rationalize ethnic cleansing? Did you ever imagine you’d be this person?

    • blazera@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      18
      ·
      2 hours ago

      You’re pro genocide if you vote for anyone that has explicitly voted to arm and fund the genocide

      • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        27
        arrow-down
        4
        ·
        2 hours ago

        LOL it took a whole hour

        you kids are slacking

        and no. voting for harris does NOT make me “pro-genocide,” no matter how much you wish it did.

        have fun watching jill stein get a single digit percentage of the vote. if that. but don’t feel like you accomplished something by throwing your vote away, because you didn’t

              • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                8
                arrow-down
                2
                ·
                1 hour ago

                The problem is that “support genocide” is being used overly broadly.

                The stated policy of the Biden/Harris administration is that Israel has a right to defend itself.

                Surprise! They do. Every sovereign nation has that right.

                As a result of that stated policy, Biden and Harris both support providing weapons and funding for the continual defense of Israel.

                https://www.npr.org/2024/08/23/g-s1-19232/kamala-harris-israel-gaza-dnc

                So follow me here:

                1. Israel has a right to defend itself.
                2. The US will support that defense.

                Where it breaks down is Bibi and Likud taking that defensive support and directing it into the Genocide.

                That’s on THEM. The United States is making a good faith effort to provide support for the defense of Israel. Israel is intentionally misapplying that support.

                Trump’s stated policy is that Israel needs to kill everyone quicker.

                https://apnews.com/article/trump-biden-israel-pr-hugh-hewitt-21faee332d95fec99652c112fbdcd35d

                “They’re losing the PR war. They’re losing it big. But they’ve got to finish what they started, and they’ve got to finish it fast, and we have to get on with life.”

                Only one of these two policies is pro-genocide, Trumps.

                Biden/Harris is pro-defense which is illegitimately being used for genocide, not at all the same as being pro-genocide.

                • Krono@lemmy.today
                  link
                  fedilink
                  arrow-up
                  3
                  arrow-down
                  5
                  ·
                  45 minutes ago

                  So is your argument that the Biden/Harris administration is blind, or stupid?

                  If I give my kid an AR-15 and they shoot up a school, I may or may not be culpable.

                  But if I hand them another AR after the first shooting, they kill again, and then I give them another, and another, and keep handing them weapons for months, and theres a pile of 15,000 dead children, then I am definitely culpable.

                  It doesn’t matter how many times I tell the kid “this AR is for defense only”.

          • grue@lemmy.world
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            5
            arrow-down
            1
            ·
            47 minutes ago

            Why do you love Trump so much you’re trying so hard to get him into power?

          • solsangraal@lemmy.zip
            link
            fedilink
            English
            arrow-up
            12
            arrow-down
            2
            ·
            2 hours ago

            LOL ok, you’re cool with throwing your vote away

            that doesn’t mean anyone else is obliged to waste time “rationalizing” NOT throwing their vote away to you

            do what you want. just know that your third party vote did NOTHING for palestine. and NOTHING for anyone else either.

            • anticolonialist@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              arrow-up
              3
              arrow-down
              7
              ·
              45 minutes ago

              Telling someone they are throwing away their vote because they won’t support your team is right wing authoritarian voter suppression.

              • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
                link
                fedilink
                arrow-up
                1
                ·
                2 minutes ago

                “Teams” don’t enter into it.

                One candidate poses an existential threat to our country and way of life.

                One other candidate can defeat them.

                Taking a vote away from the 2nd candiadate has the same net effect as voting for the first one.

                You either help beat Trump or you help elect him. A 3rd party will not win, so voting 3rd party doesn’t help beat Trump.

            • blazera@lemmy.world
              link
              fedilink
              English
              arrow-up
              5
              arrow-down
              12
              ·
              1 hour ago

              I wish it meant we did nothing for palestine. Instead of it meaning bombs and funding continues to pour into the arms of the country thats killing them.

    • ThePowerOfGeek@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      1 hour ago

      No, you see they just happened to put her at the same table as Putin and the other scumbags. She had no say in it! And she couldn’t do anything about it! She’s the victim here, don’t ya know!

      …This is the common response you see from the Stein cultists when this photo is brought up. And it’s pure horseshit. If she had anywhere near the principles and ethics she claims to have she would have got up and left from that table immediately. But she didn’t. Because she’s a hypocritical con-artist, a charlatan.

      Stein plays the morally-upright crusader, waltzing around casting sanctimonious judgements on others. But at the end of the day she’s a far right stooge who is only interested in stroking her own ego and discretely ingratiating herself to tyrants. She can say what she want and has no accountability held against her.

      She had done so much damage to the Green movement over the past decade+. She only pops up at election time to try to make life easier for far right movements whose policies are often the antithesis of what she pretend to support.

      The Democrats should be doing more on environmental issues and holding Israel accountable for what’s going on in Palestine. But at least they aren’t hiding behind their own self-righteousness to anywhere near the degree that Stein is.

  • Zaktor@sopuli.xyz
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    3
    ·
    1 hour ago

    Russia is bad and all, but she’s much more directly a useful idiot for Republicans who are not only more directly focused on directly harming the people Stein’s campaign is targeting, but have a significantly greater ability to actually accomplish it. No one needs to trust the US establishment that Russia is bad, they know Republicans and how they’re bad.

    Also, DNC, why are you make this new on The Bulwark? Way to undercut your message.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      6
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Well that’s the whole point, Putin’s goal is to destabilize the West, that’s why he backed Trump and Stein in 2016 and 2020, it’s why he backed Brexit in 2016.

      Now, for the DNC and Bulwark, there’s a more strongly worded article on democrats.org which is straight from the DNC, unfortunately the DNC doesn’t meet our credibility guidelines for posts. LOL.

      https://democrats.org/news/icymi-jill-stein-to-campaign-today-with-alleged-russian-assets/

      "Engaging with foreign assets is a pattern for Stein. Previously, the Senate Intelligence Committee investigated links between Stein’s 2016 campaign and Russia’s efforts to interfere in the election, while an indictment brought by Special Counsel Robert Mueller found that the Kremlin’s Internet Research Agency had used social media to promote her candidacy. In 2015, Stein attended a gala in support of Russian propaganda television network, RT, where she sat at the head table alongside Vladimir Putin and Michael Flynn. Stein has repeatedly parroted Kremlin views and posted a campaign video from Moscow’s Red Square with language “ripped from Putin’s talking points.”

      Despite her ties to the Kremlin and Putin, the GOP has still embraced Jill Stein as a spoiler candidate. Donald Trump praised Jill Stein, saying he likes her “very much.”  Additionally, the GOP has been helping Stein with ballot access in an attempt to prop up her spoiler candidacy. "

  • AbouBenAdhem@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    9
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    2 hours ago

    They’re not wrong, but they could stand to recognize that some of their own policy shortcomings opened the door to her challenge.

    • can_you_change_your_username@fedia.io
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      11
      ·
      2 hours ago

      That’s always going to be the case with a first past the post election system. There can only be 2 parties with a chance to win at any one time and both are forced to be big tents. Because they have no chance at winning third parties get more choice on the issues they focus on and more freedom in how they talk about those issues.

      We need election reform. We need a voting system that gives more power to minority voices and we need an election system that makes Congress better reflect the actual vote. I like STAR voting and want to move the house to proportional representation. We would most likely still have 2 big tent more or less center parties that will trade the plurality but the big tents would have to work with the minority party representatives to get enough votes to pass legislation. It’s possible that more minority party visibility and them being taken more seriously would lead to a more ideologically diverse Senate and it would almost certainly boost minority party power in state and local elections.

  • TheAlbatross@lemmy.blahaj.zone
    link
    fedilink
    arrow-up
    7
    arrow-down
    26
    ·
    2 hours ago

    Seems a little cruel.

    Her policies are far better than the DNC’s, though I understand that part of being a candidate with zero chance to win is being able to say whatever you want without consequence.

    I don’t think there’s any pragmatic reason to vote for Stein, since it’s so incredibly important that Trump not win, but I think calling her a useful idiot isn’t helpful.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      24
      arrow-down
      2
      ·
      2 hours ago

      In this instance, “useful idiot” has a very specific meaning:

      https://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/useful idiot

      : a naive or credulous person who can be manipulated or exploited to advance a cause or political agenda

      It is one task of the KGB [in 1982] to apply its skills of secrecy and deception to projecting the Soviet party’s influence. This it does through contacts with legal Communist Parties abroad, with groups sympathetic to Soviet goals, with do-gooders of the type that Lenin once described as “useful idiots” … .

      Re: the Lenin thing:

      https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Useful_idiot

      “A useful idiot or useful fool is a pejorative description of a person, suggesting that the person thinks they are fighting for a cause without fully comprehending the consequences of their actions, and who does not realize they are being cynically manipulated by the cause’s leaders or by other political players.[1][2] The term was often used during the Cold War to describe non-communists regarded as susceptible to communist propaganda and psychological manipulation.[1] A number of authors attribute this phrase to Vladimir Lenin, but this attribution is not supported by any evidence. Similar terms exist in other languages.”

    • Eldritch@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      ·
      1 hour ago

      Policy that never gets implemented is meaningless. It cannot be better. I mean if that weren’t the case you’d be a fool not to elect me. Because of my policy is that every person in America gets a million dollars. And I guarantee you that will help people far more than anything Stein is proposing.

      What the Simple Minds don’t comprehend or want to understand. Is that Jill Stein is in many ways exactly like Donald Trump. They will tell you what you want to hear. Regardless of their ability to deliver on it.

      All liberal policy sucks. Regardless of whether it’s conservative or progressive. Their reflexive recoiling from anything even tangentially related to socialism. Their need to shove capitalism in everything especially in places it should never be. If you vote for conservative. You get sodomized against your will. Dry and rough. When you vote for progressive. They sodomize you against your will still. But they will be gentle about it provide lube and even sometimes a reach around. Voting for Jill Stein you are lied to and told that the outcome will be better than either of those. Only to find that you will still be sodomized dry by a conservative. Only now Jill Stein and Putin will be standing behind you high-fiving. Which is actually worse.

      Not to demean or Kink shame those that like sodomy. But even they like some consideration from their partner. Something which sadly only one of the parties currently in this presidential election can actually offer.

    • halcyoncmdr@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      1 hour ago

      She can say her policies are whatever gets votes. She has no chance of winning and having a chance to implement them.

      If you know you won’t ever have to follow through, there’s no punishment for promising anything.

    • jordanlund@lemmy.worldOPM
      link
      fedilink
      arrow-up
      10
      arrow-down
      3
      ·
      3 hours ago

      P.S. can I just say how bad does it have to be that a Right-Center news source agrees and promotes the DNC?