• Blackmist@feddit.uk
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    136
    ·
    6 days ago

    Oh no! The type of capitalism where we have to compete!

    Make it go away, Daddy Trump!

  • gizmonicus@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    79
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    Good. Fuckem. They make shitty, oversized trucks that are a danger to pedestrians and people who drive reasonably sized cars anyway.

    • Blackmist@feddit.uk
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      20
      ·
      6 days ago

      My boss in the UK got one. In bright red. It looks like he’s driving a fucking fire engine.

      • GingerGoodness@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        7
        ·
        6 days ago

        My old boss was a huge man who went around in a little yellow convertible. We called him Noddy.

        May I suggest calling him Fireman Sam?

    • Dr. Moose@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      12
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      As an European living in Asia and can’t help but cringe at American cars. They’re so far behind. And it’s the car country. Japan has better cars and better rail. Embarassing.

      • fishy@lemmy.today
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        Agreed. I’m American and think American manufacturers make the ugliest and worst cars. Outside of the Corvette, which remains the best spots car in it’s price range.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Targeted tariffs and protectionism can help a situation like this, combined with subsidies like the ones Trump cancelled, to give legacy manufacturers a temporary respite to retool and innovate. However backtracking on your transition, reverting to the tried and true short term profits is just hiding your head in the sand. GM will find itself increasingly marginalized and more years behind. You can’t hide behind trumps skirt forever

  • SoftestSapphic@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    76
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    Dam maybe some of the American automakers who took billions in subsidies should have built cheaper cars instead of the largest trucks possible to skirt regulations.

    I literally can’t afford an American car, i can afford a BYD tho.

    • lightnegative@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      14
      ·
      6 days ago

      I can afford neither, but if I had to save up for one it would be the BYD.

      American cars are just large, stupid and inefficient. Also the parts are very expensive here in New Zealand

    • jaykrown@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      ·
      6 days ago

      I bought a used Chevrolet Bolt '23 which is the closest I could get, they’re still relatively cheap and mine has been working great.

  • network_switch@lemmy.ml
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    23
    ·
    6 days ago

    Tariffs be damned, I will not buy an American brand car. They’ve been mediocre my whole life and it’s always been easier to source parts for Hondas and Toyotas. I’m not sure how repairable any EV is, but I doubt American brands will top the charts of value in repairability in my lifetime

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      24
      ·
      6 days ago

      Yes. They did. That’s called competition. It forces companies to improve by destroying them, except they don’t want that. And politicians don’t want that, cause it makes corruption unstable.

      Killed Detroit too, though. But, eh, helped other parts. It’s life.

      Thus already in the 90s with the TRON OS a different approach was chosen by US regulators - threaten Japan with sanctions if it’s allowed to compete with Windows inside Japan .

      They can’t threaten China, but they can prevent Chinese competitive goods from entering US market and improving its economy again.

      Bad economy - poor and stressed people, poor and stressed people - worse political decisions, worse political decisions - good for middlemen which in our age shouldn’t exist frankly. We have the technologies for direct democracy, it’s not 1920s.

  • BeigeAgenda@lemmy.ca
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    99
    arrow-down
    2
    ·
    7 days ago

    Newsflash: American car manufacturer says “Our cars are crap and overpriced”

    • finitebanjo@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      3
      arrow-down
      5
      ·
      7 days ago

      Michael Dunne is actually someone who worked in Chinese Automotive manufacturing. He’s the Chinese car manufacturer saying “Chinese cars are good and cheap.”

      His word is basically meaningless.

  • jubilationtcornpone@sh.itjust.works
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    84
    ·
    7 days ago

    If you’re one of the largest and oldest car manufacturers in the world and the most “innovative” thing you’ve managed to do in the last 20 years is rebrand Buick into a young family brand, then you probably need some good competition.

  • SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    51
    ·
    edit-2
    7 days ago

    The same thing happened in the 80s with Japan. The Japanese were no longer making crappy cars but small and very reliable, affordable cars. Detroit was still making rust buckets, obsessing over powerful engines with bodies that rotted out and defects galore. Detroit got beaten up badly (Chrysler had to get a gov bailout) until they cleaned up their act and improved their products. Protecting Detroit from competition would’ve just saddled US consumers with decades more of crappy, overpriced, low quality, cars.

    https://imprimis.hillsdale.edu/how-detroits-automakers-went-from-kings-of-the-road-to-roadkill/

    We still don’t let in the small pickups the rest of the world enjoys.

    • ChickenLadyLovesLife@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      16
      ·
      6 days ago

      defects galore

      A friend of mine from high school attended the GM Institute and became an engineer for them. One of his first projects was on a team that bought a Lexus and an Infiniti when they first came on the market and took them apart to see how many production defects they had. He said a typical American car at the time (and this was in the '90s after quality had rebounded somewhat from its disastrous nadir) had 300-400 defects. The Infiniti they took apart had 2. The Lexus had 0.

    • sobchak@programming.dev
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      5
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      Did Japan back then pay their assembly line workers the equivalent of $5k USD/year (in today’s dollars) and have nearly no worker protections? Not a rhetorical question; I just don’t know. Seems like Japan had a better standard of living back then compared to Chinese workers now, so I would guess their workers were compensated and treated better.

      Not defending US auto corps (or any corp for that matter). The regulatory capture in the US is insane, and workers aren’t treated as well as most of the rest of the first world.

      • ToadOfHypnosis@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        5
        ·
        6 days ago

        Japan used state capitalism to promote it’s auto industry and other key sectors to sustain strong growth. America’s weakened billionaire owned government system is just being strip mined into the ground. We won’t be able to compete in an economy that’s only product is wealth extraction because of our massive corruption.

        • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
          link
          fedilink
          English
          arrow-up
          1
          ·
          6 days ago

          Back then American industries were just complacent due to insufficient competition, and Japan’s industrial development was a bit of a miracle (that “living in year 2000 since 1980s” joke).

      • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        4
        ·
        6 days ago

        Japan back then had (and still has) an interesting socioeconomic system, a bit similar to samurai clans went cartels, where workers are supposed to work all their life in one place (or close to that), don’t squeal about worker rights and such, but be covered by lots of company-provided social nets and guarantees.

      • Alcoholicorn@mander.xyz
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        arrow-down
        1
        ·
        6 days ago

        5K/year isn’t exactly poverty when rent is <200, phone data is 20, and you can get pic for 1.50 USD. I too would like them to be treated better, but I dont know if their overall situation is worse than the average american worker making 50K, but spending 24K on rent, 12K on car payments, and 16USD if they eat out.

    • Waffle@infosec.pub
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      6
      arrow-down
      1
      ·
      6 days ago

      I would kill for a small electric truck… Telo is calling my name, but they don’t have a functioning product yet.

      • Machinist@lemmy.world
        link
        fedilink
        English
        arrow-up
        3
        ·
        6 days ago

        Right there with you on small trucks, the kid and I have been drooling over the Slate even if it is Bezos. I drive a '98 Ranger, and we’ve been kicking around the idea of a Ranger electric conversion.

    • AA5B@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      2
      ·
      edit-2
      6 days ago

      Protecting Detroit from competition would’ve just saddled US consumers with decades more of crappy, overpriced, low quality, cars.

      And it did. Japanese companies maintained a solid portion of the market in the US, a notable lead in quality, and many consumers no longer willing to waste money on crappy overpriced low quality cars from American companies. American cars were forced to get better and they’re better off for it, but they resisted the entire time, just like today.

  • Fair Fairy@thelemmy.club
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    43
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    So here is the thing.
    U lost. The moment I need American people to bail you out, you need to treat American people way way the fuck better.

    Worker rights, mandatory vacations, work protections, pensions, guaranteed healthcare etc.

    • rottingleaf@lemmy.world
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      Bailouts are unacceptable period. Trained workers, factories, factory hardware, logistics specialists, engineers, patents and so on - they all remain in the economy. That a company fails and goes bankrupt is not a bad thing. It’s just that company. Not the industry as a whole. If there are no additional mechanisms.

      Somehow Americans seem to have forgotten that the kind of “capitalism” which gets defended is about this exactly - a company goes bankrupt, too bad. There are other companies which will hire its workers and buy its assets. Possibly new companies created by its former employees. Its shareholders have gambled and lost, well, their problem. That’s what an unregulated market is, by the way, and not bailouts to big fish and horse dicks for small fish.

      If something works differently - workers don’t find a new place to work in, factories go to scrap metal, engineers go flip burgers, patents are collected by trolls, and new companies are not being created, - then something has been broken by an existing policy.

      Patents are the worst of it, but also non-compete clauses, legal impediments for creating new businesses, legal expenses making it harder, - these things have to be removed.

      I mean, people on Lemmy love to dream of something like what you list, those things are good, but maybe fixing some basic things about what you already have is no less useful. Especially since these fixes do not cost any money to maintain, while, well, pensions and healthcare do.

  • thann@lemmy.dbzer0.com
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    42
    arrow-down
    1
    ·
    6 days ago

    So they dont care about making cars for the world market, they just want regulations to allow them to milk the american market…

  • Dammam No. 7@lemmy.world
    link
    fedilink
    English
    arrow-up
    27
    ·
    edit-2
    6 days ago

    Six months ago I moved from the US to a country where BYD and other Chinese brands are available. In the past I owned GM cars. The former GM executive is correct. After trying Chinese cars I find it extremely difficult to justify paying 40-60% more for a car made by GM or anyone else. GM’s best selling cars here are made by its Chinese joint ventures and aren’t available for sale in the US, and they are the only GM cars I would buy.

    • kalpol@lemmy.ca
      link
      fedilink
      English
      arrow-up
      4
      ·
      6 days ago

      They’re pretty well known here for low quality flashy vehicles, with premiums for luxury not quality.