Disappointed in the comments here so far. There’s a cardinal rule of improv that also works well for many other things in life, politics included: “yes, and”.
This is a great change that will save folks money and make the country just a little bit fairer. Celebrate that, and then use the momentum to push for more. This builds alliances and a shared vision, instead of devolving into petty squabbles around direction.
It’s definitely a start.
You can please some of the people some of the time, but none of the people all of the time.
Do you mean all of the people none of the time?
Same difference
How so?
“I can please none of the people all of the time,” equates to, “I can always please no one,” or… “I can never please anyone.”
This is not the same as, “I can please all of the people none of the time,” which is, “I can never please everyone.”
literacy is hard mkay
This seems very important to argue with a stranger about
It’s the principal of the matter. (See subject headline)
I’m genuinely proud of you for this joke. Bravo! No notes.
“I can please none of the people all of the time,” reads to me as there is no one you can please every time; i.e. you will disappoint everyone at some point. Which I feel is as true as not being able to please everyone.
I hear you. Look into the difference between contraposistive and converse.
“all of the people none of the time” means you will never please 100% of everyone. As in, maybe some people, but not everyone.
“none of the people all of the time” means you will always please 0% of people.They’re very different statements.
I love this reply.
The problem is that supporters of the "business as usual politicians such as this (or pardoning federal inmates convicted of marijuana possession of which there were zero) hold things up like this whenever one criticizes them in order to claim that they’re doing so much to help the country.
Throwing scraps on the floor in order to get better polling numbers before an election isn’t serving the people.
Then criticize them then and have them stay on topic, and I’ll be right there with ya. Right now though, they’re not using it as a bludgeon. It’s just a nice win. Do you not see how your approach will lead to nothing but cynicism over time? Even if you strive not to, you will begin to view every win as some sort of maneuver to get one over on you.
Biden started the momentum for capping late fees over a year ago. He mentioned it in his State of the Union address. This is just how government works. I don’t think having some progress made in March of an election year after initiating desire to make progress over a year ago is scaps on the floor. It is competent governing.
How about fucking “convenience fees” when I do shit like pay my fucking rent?
Always real “convenient” that there’s a charge for paying your bills.
We used to pay our rent in 15-20 installments, one every day or two. The office of the apartment building we lived in was on the way to our apartment, so it wasn’t any inconvenience for us to just drop a check in their drop box when we passed by, but I like to think it was mildly irritating for them to have to deal with the book-keeping. They asked us not to on multiple occasions but their only online option had a small “convenience charge” attached, so… No, thank you. I’d be happy to use it if they paid me a “convenience fee” for not making them process 20 checks every month.
The real issue is that the apartment building is charged a fee by their payment processor to use electronic payments, and they didn’t want to pay it. It is a convenience fee for the bank customer (the building) because they have to do less work cashing checks.
It’s stupid to try to pass that to people living in the building. Most personal bank accounts allow you to pay automatically with a check that’s mailed for free. Paying by check is not inconvenient for individuals, it’s only inconvenient for the person cashing all the checks.
The issue is further up the chain but it’s an issue nonetheless. Banks want to go back to physical transactions about as much as people do, so in reality they should be charging for the physical to get people to move to digital.
It’s safer, faster, and encourages more spending, just like a credit card does.
But the fees for check processing were already baked into the system before credit cards even existed, so they’re not allowed to charge extra for a check, no matter how much they want to be rid of them.
These systems can change as they have done everywhere except in the US. In most of Europe digital transfers are free and checks virtually nonexistent.
It’s ridiculously cheap to process a check online. If they’re really trying to tell me it costs them 5 dollars to process a fucking check, they’re getting completely screwed. So it’s either lying and greed or unbelievable incompetence.
Right but it saves labor in the office, and the cost of dealing with bounced checks, and the accounting is much easier when payments are made online, so the landlord ought not put the gross cost into the rent. It’s cost and savings to the landlord, likely netting out to nothing, or a savings on the online accounts.
In a small restaurant, I understand cash discount. They are gonna have to count the drawer at the end of the night either way. In an apartment building, no. That’s charging people for saving you time and effort, it’s a junk fee.
Let me ask you a question: do you think it takes brains and talent to rent out apartments? The answer may surprise you!
That sounds like a nightmare for bookkeeping… I’m not sure if it’s genius, evil, or both.
How did you keep track of which checks were cashed, and which ones were pending???Our bank had a really nice web interface for that. We could just go to the website and see all of the checks, the amounts, and the dates they were cashed, and we weren’t using checks for any other purpose, so there wasn’t anything else diluting the list. They could have made it a hassle for us by selectively “losing” some occasionally, I suppose, but they never did.
It would have exacerbated the hassle for them as well.
So my bank will mail a check for me, on my end it’s similar to setting up a transfer. I know WFH and BoA also offer this, so I assume it’s common.
This method also means they have to open an envelope.
Based
Maybe you do know, but in case you don’t, the “convenience fee” is (usually) just the price the vendor has to pay to process a credit card transaction. Because in order to accept credit cards as payment in the first place, they have to pay the credit card network for the privilege.
Providing the exact same service to you is more expensive for them based entirely on the method you use to pay. You bet they’re going to pass that extra expense onto you. The alternative is raising their service charge to eat the cost and screwing over people who pay with check or cash. Which is what most retail stores tend to do.
Though, I agree, I’d rather they just do the fucking math and charge a rate that covers their operating expenses. It’s shouldn’t be my problem to pay their itemized expenses. Just know that if they did so, we’ll be charged the same total either way.
It’s a similar argument with tipping culture. “Oh, you have to tip, employees rely on it to make ends meet!” Sure, but why is that my problem? If the business can’t create a business model that properly pays for the expenses it needs to function, they should go out of business. Raise prices. I’ll pay the same as the tip, fine, just stop playing these frivilous smoke and mirror games with my bill.
Yeah. It’s all about shifting the blame. Louis Rossmann did some videos on these exact issues.
We have a flat $5 convenience fee added on to our rent regardless of using credit card or bank transfer. Credit card gets and extra % fee on top of that.
Holy shit how are Boe Jiden’s consumer protection agencies so based all day long? Not only do we have this EXCELLENT SHIT from the CFPB, we also get the constant anti-trust lawsuits from QUEEN Lina Khan, who is making the FTC relevant again!
Antitrust has been dead for generations, and for the first time in my+grandparents lifetime we see the government trying to reign in the travesty that is American corporatism. Fuck damn I love to see it!
Also capped insulin prices and old people drugs. The man is speedrunning pothole legislation, oh yeah and he literally fucking made a national pothole fixing Bill.
Biden is definitely going down like Carter where 2 decades later everyone benefits from his presidency and are like “fuck he was actually pretty good”.
Lemmy leftie morons: JoE BiDeN hAtEs Us!
It’s like they ignore all of this news and act like all he’s ever done is beat the shit out of rail workers…
Yeah I can’t believe he personally crucified union members with railroad spikes, I thought that was overboard, if a little impressive at his age.
I would hold off on any antitrust wins. That record is mixed at best.
They’re trying for the first time in forever, I count that as a win
Idk you gotta start somewhere
Leave me out of this 😁
The banking industry opposes caps on overdraft and credit card late fees
I’m shocked
I love all the little things his administration keeps doing, and they’re good. I just wish he had some big initiative he could hang his hat on. Little things like this - while good - don’t really get people excited and aren’t the sea change(s) we need.
I know, a big part of that is congress.
But damn surely there’s a lot more ballsy stuff that could have been done by now. Weed not being federally legalized yet is stupid, for one thing.
There are a lot of big things that would be celebrated if our media covered it differently and if Biden was as self-aggrandizing as Trump.
But the little things are really what make me want to vote for Biden again. This is competent governing. In my field, I’ve seen how the little things lead to big things. Like the approval of off shore wind farms that were stalled under Trump are now approved and constructed leading to the first utility scale offshore wind farm in the US. A huge accomplishment from one little approval.Trump will probably campaign saying, “In 2024 I reduced junk fees,” and his people will believe him.
Like the approval of off shore wind farms that were stalled under Trump are now approved and constructed leading to the first utility scale offshore wind farm in the US.
And now I understand why my dad randomly decided to talk about “windmills killing whales.” As if he ever gave a shit about them before right wing media told him to be mad about it…
The Inflation Reduction Act is one of the most significant pieces of legislation in a long time
You’re right that it was a big deal.
What makes you say “of all time” though? That seems like an exaggeration but I’m interested in why I may be wrong.
It gets the US within spitting distance of the 2030 target of %50 of 2005 emissions.
Even if this is low hanging fruit, I love him doing stuff like this. I remember how infuriating it is to get some random charge on an account, call up the bank to report fraud, only to be told it’s because a savings account needs X dollars in it or some nonsense charge like that.
Do you know how to eat a whale?
One bite at a time.
This is great and all, but yeah. This is “yay, the world is very slightly less crappy.”
Would you rather nothing was done?
Seriously. These people are fucking babies.
We need interest caps and a social safety net so people don’t have to turn to 29% predatory lending.
That kind of commie talk makes St. Reagan cry.
Interest caps mean that poor people just won’t get any credit at all.
Yeah, because lenders are going to turn down 10% if they can’t get 29%…
10% guaranteed is more than enough to motivate lenders.
If you are credit worthy and lenders can give you 10% they will, because there is another lender out there that will give you 10% if you are good for it. If you are getting a 29% interest rate it’s because you are a default risk, it’s unsecured, a short term loan, or any combination of the 3.
Rates just don’t come out of thin air. It’s based off of risk. If you cap rates at 10% then the only people who will get credit at 10% are going to be wealthy people.
If you are getting a 29% interest rate it’s because
That’s credit card interest…
And we’re talking about credit cards…
At least I am, and everyone else. Because this is the comment section of an article about credit cards.
If you’re talking about something else, maybe you should let people know? Or at least be understanding when others can’t read your mind.
I’m talking about all types of credit, including a line of credit like a credit card. It’s unsecured so the rate is way higher. If you capped the rate on credit cards then people who are higher credit risk won’t be given credit.
People who are credit worthy get spammed with all sorts of credit card offers for low APR cards. With an high 700-800 credit score you could score a line of credit at 10% APR but you’d have to go to a bank or credit union to get it.
It’s never truly guaranteed, even if there’s collateral.
Guaranteed as in rate of return for the lender…
Like, yeah, there’s some breakage, but your return on investment is going to be close to interest rate.
Buy a stock and you might beat 10%, you might not.
Buy debt, and you get your interest or sell it to a third party for a smaller amount, likely still more than the amount loaned, just piled high with interest.
It’s not guaranteed because a lot of people default of their loans.
And collateral can lose value after the loan is issued.
Sure, if it’s annual 1000% that’s bullshit and predatory. But let’s not go overboard and cap it at at 5% because interest rates fluctuate and some people won’t get credit unless the rate is a bit higher
Those are weird numbers to pull out of the air based on what you replied to.
5% is the interest rate right now, so it’s not out of the air
Great step forward. Now eliminate debit card overdrafting and those fees.
They’re capping them too.
Sweet
The U.S. Chamber of Commerce said it would be filing a lawsuit against the CFPB "to prevent this misguided and harmful rule from going into effect.”
Don’t hold your breath. The current state of the judiciary is nakedly hostile to administrative law generally and bank regulations specifically.
Keep an eye on Consumer Financial Protection Bureau v. Community Financial Services Association of America, Limited. Might not even have the CFPB for much longer.
You likely will see most small banks end their overdraft programs as they will have too many losses without a way to make it back up on the fee income. Then the community banks will lose customers to the Bank of America type mega banks leading to less competition and worse banking conditions.
And people who spend money they don’t have will still be charged fees. Instead people will get charged fees on the other end for writing bad checks or missing payments due to auto payments being rejected for non sufficient funds.
… will close a loophole to slash late fees charged by credit card companies from an average of $32 to $8, which the agency projects will save $220 annually for 45 million Americans.
Someone double check my math here. But I’m reading this statement to say that 45 million Americans are - on average - late on 10 credit card payments each year. That’s probably not a good sign of a healthy economic outlook.
49% of Americans can’t afford a 1000$ emergency. I can see why you would use your credit card, try to pay it with your next paycheck, paycheck is late (because of course it is) then miss credit card payment.
Those are very thin margins that a lot of Americans deal with.
Yeah, but something like that is happening 9 or 10 times a year for 45 million Americans. That’s crazy!
$220 / ($32 - $8) looks like a little over 9 to me also. Wow. That’s a lot of people struggling, probably trying to stay afloat paying off cards with other cards and missing more payments.
Yeah I freak out if I accidentally pay a card late. I can’t imagine the stress of missing that many payments a year. At some point, you’re just in a hole and digging to get yourself out.
deleted by creator
Watch the credit card companies switch to charging late fees per day instead of per month that you’re late.
Even though banks will still be able to charge limited overdraft fees, it won’t be able to exceed the banks’ losses under the rule. The CFPB has not finalized an amount but is exploring overdraft fees capped at $3, $6, $7, or $14, plus $.50 per transaction. The overdraft rule is currently under review.
They need to move their asses on this one. I think many banks charge $25-35 for an overdraft, an absurd amount of money that is obviously being charged to someone who doesn’t have money.
I know somethat charge that DAILY!
Legalized loan sharking.
While they’re at it, why not cap processing fees as junk fees? It for sure doesn’t cost 2.9% of your grocery bill to facilitate the payment- it’s all automated and there’s little to no labor involved in the actual processing, it’s just collecting economic rent
Or 30% to deliver an app.
Fuck it, just make everything free
Let’s cap fees doctors can charge for missing an appointment. Since doctors seem to want to schedule months out sometimes shit comes up and we don’t know our schedule months away.
I mean, if you have other shit going on that day, it’s kinda on you to cancel or reschedule your appointment before whatever cutoff they have instead of just not going.
You made the commitment to be at your appointment at the scheduled time, and if you no show that’s time that could have been spent seeing another patient and money they can’t make because of your actions.
I’ve never had an issue if something came up the day of and I needed to reschedule, as long as I called the moment I knew I might not make it.
This is true, but if I made an appointment for 9, how come I don’t see anyone but the nurse for two hours?
Seems like the doctor doesn’t have a commitment to take care of my problem at the scheduled time.
how come I don’t see anyone but the nurse for two hours?
- Because the doctor showed up late.
- They overbooked / double booked (maybe with a last minute urgent caller or maybe just because they know they will have so many no shows.)
- Maybe the medical assistants called out and the processing time for people is backed up.
- Maybe they decided to flirt with a patient or two or took an extra long bathroom break.
- Maybe they had a family emergency and had to step out or take a call.
- Maybe a patient called in with a critical need and they had to prioritize that because it’s a life and death situation or something.
- Maybe they farted and it wasn’t just a fart.
- Maybe they don’t like you.
- Maybe their car was towed because their medical bills are piling up with insane interest and they weren’t able to work as much as they needed to make the bills the last few months and they needed to take a bicycle
- Maybe they got an OUI and lost their license
- Aliens
Pick one, or many.
Or most likely of all for a wait of that magnitude: their employer forces them to cram more patients than they should into a short time, and it turns out not every medical issue falls into nice little predictable fifteen minute block, and someone or multiple people earlier than you had major issues to be sorted.
Also common: patients earlier than you showing up late but their employer forces them to see patients even if they got there with only a minute of their appointment left and now it throws off everyone’s appointments for the entire rest of the day
Also who’s actually charging late fees? Most places the policy is to fire you from the clinic for ~3 no shows
People here acting like a doctor is just sitting in the back twiddling their thumbs laughing while you wait. They just want to see everyone and get home, they don’t want to be seeing people late either, but stuff happens.
$50. Mine certainly does and I have only truly screwed up once. I got hyper focused and lost track of time. I don’t get too upset over it though. Policy is policy…
The most common 3 in my experience working in a doctor’s office are:
- other patients came late and still were seen.
- patients lied about the primary reason for their visit or brought up anxiety/depression issues that you can’t just reschedule.
- doctor and a patient got too chatty about something not related to medicine.
For a lot of older people, that appointment may have been the highlight of their week, so I understood some of their desire to talk to everyone for as long as possible.
On the inside the fault will always lie with the customers. I have worked on so many sides of business relationships to know how that bias works so very well.
The reality is that there are countless reasons :)
So? Do I get to deduct from their bill for failing to meet their commitment?
We all have shit that comes up. Doctors too.
No, because your schedule change is likely known well in advance, while their delays are happening in real time.
It’s typically not possible to know 2 hours in advance if they’re going to be running 2 hours behind, so they can’t communicate that to you like you can communicate your need to reschedule.
Their schedule delays are caused by things happening to other people in real time, so no. That doesn’t fly.
Particularly when the root cause is in fact their employer staffing to maximize profits.
The system is overwhelmed and you are scheduled months out because there are so many people waiting ahead of you. If you cancel appropriately that spot can be given to someone else that is waiting. As a patient I want higher punitive fees on people that don’t cancel appropriately - not to stick it to them but to encourage them to actually call ahead and cancel so more spots can open up. This is not the same as junk fees.
I’d rather have $20 per hour that a doctor keeps me waiting.
My doctor cancelled on me and pushed my appointment back 30 days, oh by the the way, your referral expires before your next appointment now… Fucking hell.
Okay. Why can’t they just get rid of the fees altogether? Why do we need to have ANY kind of junk fees for anything? Oh wait, I know. To make rich people richer.
They actually should, because they already change interest far in excess of LIBOR.
Like they’re going to just take the lack of those fee profits off the bottom line. Look forward to the new and/or increased yearly fees now.
Is your suggestion to just continue to pay the companies whatever they ask for without a fight?
It wasn’t a suggestion at all.
I was just saying that we, the consumer are going to end up paying for it somehow or another.
then why have any consumer protections? and why have a minimum wage?
They are just going to make up for it with higher prices right? Let’s make min wage $1 so we can all enjoy low prices. right?
You are playing into their hands
Even if that was the end result, still better than now as it would be a planned expense rather than an additional weight on people in financial trouble
Have to start somewhere. This might move the fees upfront and keep people from getting trapped when the person doesn’t read all the fine print.
Assuming the total remains similar, its good to move the burden away from people who are struggling.
Just extend that to medical care, and we Gucci… How about outlawing punitive deductibles for health insurance?
